Article Reinforcing Weekly Ezine #68's Commentary on Hypocrisy
Looks like I'm not the only one noting how the Republican Party has used its supposed religious purity to be a distinguishing factor to cause religious voters to vote for the Party and its candidates.
I hope the country is starting to wake up. Religious beliefs are something religions persuade people to adopt. Religions are not allowed to take over governments and impose religious beliefs on non-believers. When this happens, its called Theocracy.
Relgious believers have everything they are allowed to have to persuade. They have access to direct mail, television, radio, newspapers and magazines. They are allowed to knock on doors and communicate with people. Why is it some religious believers want to have more than they are allowed to have?
Here is a link to a NY Times OpEd by Charles M. Blow.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/27/opinion/27blow.html?th&emc=th
I hope the country is starting to wake up. Religious beliefs are something religions persuade people to adopt. Religions are not allowed to take over governments and impose religious beliefs on non-believers. When this happens, its called Theocracy.
Relgious believers have everything they are allowed to have to persuade. They have access to direct mail, television, radio, newspapers and magazines. They are allowed to knock on doors and communicate with people. Why is it some religious believers want to have more than they are allowed to have?
Here is a link to a NY Times OpEd by Charles M. Blow.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/27/opinion/27blow.html?th&emc=th





Comments